← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/1375/2012dismissed

Sundar Pandit v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-03-31Mr. Justice Navaniti Prasad Singh,Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1375 of 2012 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3933 of 2012 ================================================== Sundar Pandit, son of Sri Bale Pandit, resident of Village - Pildouri, Gali No.5, P.O.+P.S.- Sultanganj, District - Bhagalpur. .... .... Appellant

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department Government of Bihar, Patna

3. Bihar School Examination Board, Higher Secondary, Bihar, Patna through its Secretary.

4. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Higher Secondary, Budh Marg, Bihar, Patna.

5. The Secretary of Governing Body, A.K.Gopalan College, Sultanganj, District-Bhagalpur.

6. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Bhagalpur, District-Bhagalpur.

7. The District Magistrate Bhagalpur, District-Bhagalpur.

8. Sri Abhay Kumar, son of Sri Satish Chandra Yadav. Resident of village -Gaurachouki, P.S.-Kajreli, District-Bhagalpur. .... .... Respondents ================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the Respondents:

Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate (AC to SC 10) Mr. Parth Sarthi, Advocate ================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH) 31-03-2015 Having heard learned counsel for the appellant who was the writ petitioner, we satisfied that learned Single Judge did not erred in dismissing the

Patna High Court LPA No.1375 of 2012 (2) dt.31-03-2015 writ petition on the facts as found by him. In view of the disputed questions of facts, this court is unable to decide the same and learned Single Judge rightly relegated the writ petitioner to civil court of competent jurisdiction to assert and establish his right. Accordingly, this Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed.

(Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.) (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajeev/- U