← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/5375/2012disposed

Dr. Prof. Bishwamohan Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-04Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.5375 of 2012 (6) dt.04-02-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5375 of 2012 ====================================================== Dr. (Prof.) Bishwamohan Kumar Sinha S/O Shri Shyam Nandan Sinha R/O Salimpur Ahara, Near Saraswati Central School, P.O. Kadamkuan, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, District - Patna, Retired from the post of Reader and Head of Department in English from S.M.D. College, Punpun, Patna .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, Through its Chief Secretary, Shri S. Sheo Kumar, Higher Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna

2. Shri S. Sheo Kumar, the Chief Secretary of Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna

3. Shri Arun Kumar, Vice - Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh-Gaya, Gaya

4. Shri D.K. Yadav, Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh-Gaya, Gaya

5. Devesh Kumar Sinha, Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh-Gaya, Gaya

6. Dr. Subhash Prasad Singh, Principal, S.M.D. College, Punpun, Patna .... .... Opp.Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Padarath Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to SC-8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-02-2015 On call, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Learned AC to SC-8 and Sri Bipin Kumar, learned counsel for Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya are present. It was submitted by Sri Bipin Kumar, learned counsel for Magadh University, Bodh Gaya that in compliance with the order of the writ court, the representation of the petitioner was examined and a detailed order has been passed, which has been brought on record as Annexure-B to the show cause.

Keeping in view the fact that in compliance with the

Patna High Court MJC No.5375 of 2012 (6) dt.04-02-2015 order of the writ court, a reasoned order has already been passed, which has been brought on record as Annexure-B to the show cause, there is no need to further proceed with the matter. If the petitioner feels aggrieved with the order i.e. Annexure-B to the show cause, he would be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy.

With above observation and liberty, the petition stands disposed of.

NKS/- (Rakesh Kumar, J) U