Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42703/2023withdrawn

Saurav Basu v. The Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Bihar, Patna

2023-11-07Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42703 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2017 Thana- VIGILANCE District- Patna ====================================================== SAURAV BASU son of Adhir Kumar Basu Flat no-6/201, Shakti Kunj Apartment, plot no-b-9/3, Gautam Buddha Nagar Ps- Sector-62, NOida DistNoida U.P ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Bihar, Patna Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gouranga Chatterjee, Adv.

Mr. Sahil Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Pulkit Ranjan, Adv.

Mr. Ujjwal Raj, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present and he has no criminal antecedent. Earlier, the anticipatory bail of the petitioner was rejected by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.12.2020 in Cr. Misc. No. 81 of 2017 due to wrong submission on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner. It is further submitted that during the tenure of the petitioner, the company had received only Rs. 10 lakhs against advance payment as per the first agreement and rest payments have been made after his tenure i.e. leaving the organization,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42703 of 2023(3) dt.07-11-2023 2/2 which has been mentioned in Annexure 7. It is further submitted that during the enquiry, no adverse allegation against the petitioner was found.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that he wants to withdraw this application with a liberty to surrender before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seeks regular bail and the learned Court below is directed to pass order on the same day in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order considering the fact that in the tenure of the petitioner, the company had received only Rs.10 lacs against advance payment as per the first agreement.

4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T