Ajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.45670 of 2018 ====================================================== Ajeet Kumar, son of Late Ram Chandra Mahto, resident of village Somnaha Bara Tol P.S. Chakmehsi District Samastipur.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhavesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Smt. Reena Sinha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Section 38(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 63 liters wine is said to have been recovered.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is alleged that total 63 liters wine is recovered from the field in question. The name of the petitioner has come in the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45670 of 2018 (2) dt.27-07-2018 2/2 present case on the basis of alleged recovery made from the field in question belongs to the petitioner. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions JudgeVIth-cum-Special Judge, Excise/or his successor in office of Chakmehsi P.S. Case No. 22/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T