Yashoda Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.33704 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -141 Year- 2016 Thana -BELHAR District- BANKA ====================================================== Yashoda Devi, W/o Late Ramni Mandal, R/o Vill.- Kashidih, P.S.- Belhar, District- Banka.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N.K. Agarwal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vijay Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 27-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends her arrest in Belhar P.S. Case No.141 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304(B)/34 Indian Penal Code.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased having no concern with the family affairs of the deceased and her husband.
From the written report it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33704 of 2018 (3) dt.27-07-2018 2/2 six weeks from today in connection with Belhar P.S. Case No.141 of 2016, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the SubJudge-III-cum-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Banka, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and her absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel her bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- Rohit Kr.
U T