Md. Equbal Ahmad @ Md. Eqbal Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5853 of 2014 ====================================================== Md. Equbal Ahmad @ Md. Eqbal Ahmad Son of Late Abdul Aziz Resident of Mohalla - Hazi Subhan, P.O. - Purab Sarai, Police Station - Kotwali, District - Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Home Police Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Collector-Cum-District Magistrate, Munger 4.

The Additional Collector, Munger 5.

The Sub-Registrar, Munger 6.

The Circle Officer, Sadar, Munger ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shanti Pratap, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Uma Shankar, GP-4 Mr.Mujtabaul Haque, GP-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 26-06-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That this writ application is being filed for quashing the order passed by the Collector, Munger, issued vide Memo No. 1780, dated 26.11.2012, by which the representation dated 28.11.2012 (subsequently amended as 28.12.2011), filed by the petitioner in light of the order dated 10.02.2010 passed by this Hon'ble Court in C.W.J.C. No. 9147 of 2002, has been rejected and further the Circle Officer, Sadar, Munger has been directed to file F.I.R. against the petitioner and others for

Patna High Court CWJC No.5853 of 2014(6) dt.26-06-2024 2/2 interpolation in the Government records and criminal conspiracy.

This writ application is also being filed for holding that the impugned order dated 26.11.2012, as contained in Annexure-1 is illegal, arbitrary, malafide and without any lawful justification."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U