← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29099/2025allowed

Prince Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-19Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29099 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2023 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Prince Ram, S/o Jaimangal Ram, Resident of village- Lasanda (Narsanda), P.s.- Kanti, Distt.- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate Mr. Hemant Ray, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-05-2025 Heard Mr. Abhishek Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 135 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that four unknown miscreants looted Rs. 48,03,760/- from the bank on gun point.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The F.I.R. was lodged against unknown miscreants.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29099 of 2025(2) dt.19-05-2025 2/2 During course of investigation, co-accused Ranjit Kumar has named this petitioner. It has further been submitted that nothing has been recovered from his possession. No T.I.P. has been conducted. It has also been submitted that two co-accused persons who are having similar nature of the allegation have been granted bail by learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 58126 of 2024 and 29169 of 2024. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 12.02.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 135 of 2023. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T