Sudish Ram And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.50967 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -21 Year- 2017 Thana -DUMRIAGHAT DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================
1. Sudish Ram, son of Bhola Ram
2. Bhola Ram, son of Adalat Ram Both residents of village Rampur Khajuriya, P.S. Dumariyaghat, Distt. East Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Dumariyaghat P.S. Case No. 21 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 406, 420 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that in the written report there is main allegation against co-accused Sunil Kumar Ram. These petitioners are father and brother of co-accused Sunil Kumar Ram. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Dumariyaghat P.S. Case
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50967 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017 2/2 No. 21 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T