← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3393/2012disposed

Dr. Prof. Mithilesh Kumar Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-05-06Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3393 of 2012 ====================================================== Dr. Prof. Mithilesh Kumar Singh S/o Late Durga Prasad Singh Resident of Mohalla Gaushala, Police Station and District Katihar. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Higher Education, Bihar, Patna.

4. Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura.

5. Dr. Ganesh Prasad, the Registrar, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura.

6. Dr. Arun Kumar, the Vice Chancellor, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura.

7. The Principal, D.S. College, Katihar.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Ac to Sc27 Mr. Manish Dhari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4.

06-05-2015 On call, none appeared on behalf of petitioner either to press the petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. Learned A.C. to Standing Counsel - 27 as well as learned counsel, who appears on behalf of B.N.Mandal University are present. It was submitted by learned counsel for the University that in compliance with the order of the writ court, a reasoned order has been passed and same has been brought on record as Annexure - A (series) to the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party no. 4 to 6. According to the learned counsel for

Patna High Court MJC No.3393 of 2012 (4) dt.06-05-2015 2/2 the University, order of the writ court has already been complied with in its letter and spirit. Earlier, on the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the case was adjourned for filing reply. Neither any reply has been filed nor anyone is present on behalf of the petitioner.

In view of the show cause, the Court proposes to drop the proceeding.

The petition stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay/- U