Raj Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38990 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Raj Kumar Yadav Son of Gauru Shankar Yadav Resident of Village - Shiv Nagar Ashogi, Ward No. 07, Police Station - Bairgania, District - Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pushpendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Anbazarul Haque Sahara ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2.
24-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.
The petitioner seeks bail in Complaint Case No. C-2 / 200 of 2020, registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
90 liters of Nepali Saufi Wine has been recovered from the motorcycle of the petitioner.
It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got clean antecedent and he is in custody since 08.04.2021. Investigation is complete.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38990 of 2021(2) dt.24-09-2021 2/2 Considering the nature of allegation and period of custody, the bail petition of petitioner is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J. IInd cum Special Judge, Excise Act, Sitamarhi in connection with Complaint Case No. C-2 / 200 of 2021, on the following conditions: "(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court below and shall remain physically present, as directed by the court below, and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail."
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay U T