Pappu Sharma @ Pappu Mistri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38912 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -346 Year- 2016 Thana -FATEHPUR District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Pappu Sharma @ Pappu Mistri S/o Munarik Mistri R/o Village Kudumar, P.S. Fatehpur, District - Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 346 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 504, 308, 325 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is named in the FIR and allegation against the accused person is of assault by lathi on the hand of the informant, causing injury.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner and the petitioner was not apprehended on the spot and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38912 of 2018 (3) dt.10-07-2018 2/2 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer of bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 346 of 2016 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-Xth, Gaya, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. with other that bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned and petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and shall be present before the police as and when required, otherwise prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/Priyanka/- U T