Arun Prasad @ Arun Prasad Barnwal @ Arun Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31670 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2023 Thana- MAHILA P.S District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.
ARUN PRASAD @ ARUN PRASAD BARNWAL @ ARUN SAH SON OF LATE LALAN PRASAD VILLAGE- DIWLIYA WARD NO 25 POLICE STATION- SHIKARPUR DISTRICT- WEST CHAMPARAN 2.
NAGAWALI DEVI WIFE OF ARUN PRASAD BARNWAL VILLAGEDIWLIYA WARD NO 25 POLICE STATION- SHIKARPUR DISTRICTWEST CHAMPARAN 3.
ABHISHEK KUMAR @ ABHISHEK BARNWAL SON OF ARUN PRASAD BARNWAL VILLAGE- DIWLIYA WARD NO 25 POLICE STATION- SHIKARPUR DISTRICT- WEST CHAMPARAN 4.
SUPRIYA KUMARI @ SUPRIYA @ CHANDANI KUMARI DAUGHTER OF ARUN PRASAD BARNWAL VILLAGE- DIWLIYA WARD NO 25 POLICE STATION- SHIKARPUR DISTRICT- WEST CHAMPARAN 5.
ANSHU KUMARI @ ANSHU DEVI WIFE OF ABHISHEK KUMAR VILLAGE- DIWLIYA WARD NO 25 POLICE STATION- SHIKARPUR DISTRICT- WEST CHAMPARAN ... ... PETITIONER/S
VERSUS
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
ANISHA KUMARI WIFE OF AMIT KUMAR VILLAGE- CHAUBEY TOLA PS- KUMARBAGH OP, DIST- WEST CHAMPARAN ... ... OPPOSITE PARTY/S ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31670 of 2024(2) dt.21-05-2024 2/3 for the offence punishable under sections 341 , 323 , 379, 504, 50 498A , 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of D. P Act.
3. Allegation against these petitioners is commission of torture and harassment due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry .
4. Petitioner no. 1 is father-in-law, petitioner no. 2 is mother-in-law, petitioner no. 3 is dewar, petitioner no. 4 is Nanad and petitioner no. 5 is Jethani of the victim. They are separate in mess and property. There is general and omnibus allegation is alleged against them and they have no concern with affairs of the couple. Thrust of accusation is against the husband of the victim. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5 . Learned counsel for the State opposes the bail petition .
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, let this petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bettiah Mahila
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31670 of 2024(2) dt.21-05-2024 3/3 P . S. Case No. 57 of 2023 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure . (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/Saurab hU T