← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31500/2019bail rejected

Manoj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-13Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31500 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-172 Year-2016 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali ====================================================== Manoj Kumar Singh, aged about 50 years, male, Son of Late Ram Chandra Singh Resident of Village - Chakrasul, P.S.- Vaishali, Dist.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 13-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 172 of 2016 registered for offences under sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation made in the First Information Report, a truck, loaded with material, was stolen and, ultimately recovered from Mubarak Ali who in his statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has stated that he in presence of the driver, namely, Naresh Giri and others including the petitioner, has unloaded the material from the truck.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no concern with the material and wrongly he has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31500 of 2019(2) dt.13-05-2019 2/2 been implicated in the present case on account of business rivalry but, in paragraph no.4, there is no specific statement with respect to business rivalry. The petitioner has criminal antecedent of the same nature of offence.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, above named, is rejected.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T