Farhat Jabin @ Farhat Jabi @ Farhat And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58237 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -64 Year- 2017 Thana -KOCHADHAMAN District- KISANGANJ ======================================================

1. Farhat Jabin @ Farhat Jabi @ Farhat, Wife of Nurul Alam,

2. Neelam Ara, Wife of Mujahid Alam,

3. Rasy Begum, Wife of Meraz Alam,

4. Gulneshar @ Fulshan Jahan @ Fulshan @ Gulnehar, Wife of Muzaffar Alam, All Resident of Village- Danti, P.S.- Kochadhaman, DistrictKishanganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amal Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 12-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 64 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-307, 302 & other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that all these petitioners are ladies. From the written report, it appears that there is no any allegation of overt act against these petitioners. Counsel for the informant has appeared and opposed the prayer.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58237 of 2017 (2) dt.12-12-2017 2/2 date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Kochadhaman P.S. Case No. 64 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T