Arman Khan @ Bahadur Khan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28632 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-601 Year-2025 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Arman Khan @ Bahadur Khan S/O Asmuhamad Khan R/O Vill.- Bela Mathiya, P.S.- Dariyapur, Dist.- Saran, Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kaushal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2026 Heard Mr.Kaushal Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 11.12.2025 in connection with G.R.No.10413 of 2025 corresponding to Muffasil P.S. Case No. 601 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 02.11.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 331(4),305 later on Section 317(2) and subsequently Sections 317(4), 313 of BNS were added.

3. The FIR of the occurrence of theft is against unknown.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has been transpired during investigation on the basis of the confessional statement of co-accused person, namely, Raju

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28632 of 2026(2) dt.01-05-2026 2/3 Bansfor and except the aforesaid, no other cogent material has come during investigation against the petitioner to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries four more cases other than the present one but fairly submits that the petitioner is on bail in all the cases, as mentioned in para-3 of the bail petition. Further submits that some theft articles has been recovered from the house of the petitioner.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the recovered article from possession of the petitioner is not put on TIP, even the petitioner has not been put on TIP as yet and the police, after investigation, submitted the chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 11.12.2025.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts, petitioner is not named in the FIR, the name of the petitioner has been transpired during investigation on the basis of the confessional statement of co-accused person and till date no TIP has been conducted by the prosecution, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28632 of 2026(2) dt.01-05-2026 3/3 learned A.C.J.M.-1st Saran at Chapra in connection with G.R.No.10413 of 2025 corresponding to Muffasil P.S. Case No. 601 of 2025,with the following conditions:- (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T