Patna High CourtMJC/2871/2015disposed

Ganga Ram Paswan v. The Chairman Bihar State Electricity Board Patna Sri Pritya Amrit And ORS

2017-11-15Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 2871 of 2015 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16878 of 2007 ====================================================== Ganga Ram Paswan S/o Baldeo Paswan resident of village- Pokaria Ward No. 17, P.S. Town, District- Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Chairman Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna Sri Pritya Amrit.

2. Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, the Deputy Director, Personnel, General Administrative Department, Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna.

3. Sri S.P. Singh, The General Manager Cum-Chief Engineer, Bihar State Electricity Board, Mithila Area, Darbhanga.

4. Sri B.K. Mishra, the Electric Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Samastipur.

5. Sri Sant Kumar Pathak, the Electric Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Begusarai.

6. Sri Vijay Kumar, the Financial Controller, Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna.

7. Sri Mantun Kumar Singh S/o Late Prema Devi C/o Ram Charitar Singh resident of Village- Sakhara Makhansala, Road, P.O. Varauni, DistrictBegusarai.

8. Sri Alok Kumar Paswan @ Gandhi S/o Late Prema Devi resident of village- Pokhania Ward No.37, P.S. Begusarai Nagar, DistrictBegusarai. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. B. P. Pandey, Sr. Advocate Mr. Nirbhay Prashand and Mr. Pravin Kumar Sinha, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Vinay Kriti Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma and Mr. Akhileshwar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 15-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Vinay Kriti Singh, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the Bihar Power Holding

Patna High Court MJC No.2871 of 2015 (2) dt.15-11-2017 2/2 Company Limited.

2. After some arguments, the Court does not find it to be a fit case to proceed under its contempt jurisdiction.

3. Accordingly, the application stands disposed off.

4. However, on merits, the order passed by the authorities shall be open to challenge by the petitioner, before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U