← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34775/2019dismissed

Ranjit Sharma @ Ranjit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-21Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34775 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-418 Year-2018 Thana- KUDHNI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== RANJIT SHARMA @ RANJIT KUMAR S/o Naresh Thakur @ Naresh Sharma R/o Village- Chhajan Harishankar, P.S.- Kudhani, DistrictMuzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-08-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Kudhani (O.P. Turki) P.S. Case No. 418/18, disclosing offences under Sections 394. 302 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution case is that brother of the informant had gone with the truck later on his dead body was recovered near Dariyapur Kafen and it appears that somebody looted and took away the truck after killing the brother of the informant and thrown the dead body of the deceased. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., his name transpired in this during course of investigation.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been made accused in this case only on the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34775 of 2019(3) dt.21-08-2019 2/2 confession of two co-accused persons and except that there is nothing against the petitioner to connect him with the present case.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that for further investigation in this case presence of petitioner is required and as such, he does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner rather petitioner may surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail and if any such application is filed, the court below will dispose of the same on the merit of the case, without being prejudiced by this order.

This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T