← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17786/2017disposed

Tathagat Avatar Tulsi v. The Indian Institute Of Technology, Patna And ORS

2017-12-08Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17786 of 2017 ====================================================== Tathagat Avatar Tulsi, son of Shri Tulsi Narayan Prasad, resident of -E408, Ganga Jamuna Place, Asu Enclave, Ara Garden Road, P.S.-Rukanpura, District-Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The Indian Institute of Technology, Patna Bihta, Patna though .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tathagat Avatar Tulsi ( In Person ) For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D Sanjay (Addl. Soc. Gen.) For IIT, Patna Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 08-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. Mr. Tathagat Avatar Tulsi appearing in person submits that respondents have taken a policy decision contained in Annexure-2 and as such he submits that respondents may be directed to consider his case.

Considering the nature of relief prayed by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file exhaustive representation before the Director, IIT, Patna who will look into the representation of the petitioner and pass reasoned speaking order, considering the deliberation contained in Annexure-2.

In case, the petitioner files representation alongwith a copy of this order, the Director, IIT, Patna, respondent no.2 will

Patna High Court CWJC No.17786 of 2017 (2) dt.08-12-2017 2/2 look into the grievance of the petitioner and pass reasoned speaking order within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the right and expectation of the petitioner arising out of Annexure-2. The Director, IIT, Patna would be at liberty to take appropriate decision in accordance with law within the aforesaid period of 60 days.

With the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U