Ram Balak Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28799 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2020 Thana- KARJA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

RAM BALAK CHAUHAN Son of Sadhu Chauhan Resident of VillageMakdumpur, P.S.- Karja, District- Muzaffarpur. 2.

Ganga Chauhan Son of Likhu Chauhan Resident of Village- Makdumpur, P.S.- Karja, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Nandan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar, APP .

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 15-01-2021 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Karja P.S. Case No. 70 of 2020 for the offence registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation is regarding the petitioners having inflicted several blows with knife on the chest and other part of the body of the injured person, namely, Bunilal Chauhan causing serious injuries to him whereafter the accused persons had assaulted the mother and wife of the informant and taken away valuable articles as also a sum of Rs. 5,000/-.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28799 of 2020(3) dt.15-01-2021 2/2 The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent, have been falsely implicated in the present case and are having a clean antecedent. It is also submitted that the injuries have been found to be simple in nature.

Per contra, the learned counsel for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners and taking into account the description of the injuries mentioned in paragraph nos. 34 and 46 of the case diary, this Court finds that serious injuries have been inflicted on the person of the injured and moreover the same have been stated to be on account of stabbing, hence the complicity of the petitioners is writ large in the present case, hence I do not find any merit in the present petition. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U T