Vinay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15205 of 2014 ====================================================== Vinay Kumar S/O Pramod Roy, resident of village- Lodipur, P.O. Basudeopur Chandel, P.S. Mahnar, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
The Principal Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of Bihar 3.
Bihar Agriculture Management Extension Training Institute, Jagdeo Patha, Patna, through its Director (BAMTI) ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Umesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
AC to SC 31 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-09-2024 Petitioner has inter alia prayed for following reliefs in the paragraph No.1 of the writ petition:- A. A writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing illegal/unjustified determination of merit list as given as (K) of the advertisement published on 1.8.2014 for contractual appointment under ATMA (Agriculture Technology Management Agency ) Yojna for the vacant post of Block Technical Manager, Assistant Technical Manager and Accountant by the department of Agriculture, Govt. of Bihar, Patna under for submission on Agricultural Extention (ATMA Yojna) and under the National Mission on Agricultural Extention and Technology.
B. A writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to treat every candidate equally illegible for the post of Assistant Technical Manager and not to give either weightate to agriculture graduate and post graduate. Further to re-advertise the
Patna High Court CWJC No.15205 of 2014(3) dt.30-09-2024 2/2 same by treating every stream equal and to not give weightage to agriculture graduate.
C. To any other relief/s for which petitioner is found entitled to."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents informs that the National Mission on Agriculture Extension and Technology (NMAET), Programme has come to an end and, therefore, the grievance of the petitioner cannot be sustained.
3. Considering the aforesaid submission made on behalf of the State, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U