Pushpjit Kumar Sinha v. The Central Bank Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16518 of 2015 ====================================================== Pushpjit Kumar Sinha son of late Kanti Prasad, resident of Village- Sarawn, P.O. Asarganj, Police Station- Asarganj, District- Munger, Senior Branch Manager Since removed from service, now retired, Central Bank of India, Forbesganj Branch, District- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Central Bank Of India through the General Manager (HRD) Central Office, Chander Mukhi Nariman Point Mumbai-400021 2.

The Zonal Manager, Central Bank of India, Zonal Office, B Block, 2nd floor, Maurya Lok Complex, Patna-800001 3.

The Reviewing Authority, General Manager- Audit, Zonal Audit Office, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh).

4.

The Appellate Authority cum Deputy General Manager, Central Bank of India, Zonal Office, Patna.

5.

The Disciplinary Authority/Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Purnea.

6.

The Disciplinary Authority/Assistant General Manager, Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Purne 7.

The Deputy Regional Manager, Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Purnea.

8.

The Inquiring Authority/Senior Manager, Central Bank of India, Branch Office, Katihar.

9.

The Presenting Officer/Assistant Manager, Central Bank of India, Branch Office, Balrampur, Katihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Nilanjan Chatterjee, Adv.

Mr. Sahil Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Ujjwal Raj, Adv.

Mr. Anirran Choudhri, Adv.

Mr. Pulkit Ranjan, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 01-09-2023 Despite repeated calls, nobody has bothered to appear for the petitioner, hence, it appears that the petitioner has got no interest in prosecuting the present writ petition, thus, this Court

Patna High Court CWJC No.16518 of 2015(2) dt.01-09-2023 2/2 has no option but to dismiss the present writ petition for want of prosecution.

2.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U