Raghuveer Chaudhari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29668 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-516 Year-2022 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.
Raghuveer Chaudhari S/O- Ramesh Chaudhari Khajraitha Nayavas, PsParvatta, Bharatkhand Op Dist- Khagaria 2.
Sumit Kumar @ Chotu Son Of Dayanand Choudhary Khajraitha Nayavas, Ps- Parvatta, Bharatkhand Op Dist- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Satrudhan Kumar For the State :
Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh For the Informant :
Ms. Kanchan Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 506, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, when the information was going to the house of his brother-in-law and when he reached near Khajraitha four accused persons already ambushed as they fired two rounds upon the informant. In the meantime, they also snatched golden chain of informant worth Rs. 65,000/-.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29668 of 2023(3) dt.28-08-2023 2/2 petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He further submits that no person was injured in the present case it is clear from para-2 to 4 of the case diary. Petitioner no. 1 has no criminal antecedent and petitioner no. 2 has one criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant opposed prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No.516 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T