Ibrahim @ Ibrahim Dhobi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31867 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-405 Year-2021 Thana- BASANTPUR District- Siwan ====================================================== Ibrahim @ Ibrahim Dhobi Son of Khush Mohammad @ Khush Mahammad Resident of Village - Shekhpura, P.S. - Basantpur, District - Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghwendra Pratap Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate Ms. Urmila Kumari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial Case No. 162 of 2022 arising out of Basantpur P.S. Case No. 405 of 2021 dated 17.09.2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Mr. Raghwendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this is the second attempt of the petitioner to get the relief of regular bail and the petitioner has come again mainly on the ground of his long incarceration period as well as the privilege of bail having been granted to several co-accused persons namely, Tuntun Khan @

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31867 of 2024(3) dt.30-08-2024 2/2 Samir @ Babu Khan and Shahnawaz Khan by this Bench vide orders passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 5273 of 2024 and 68396 of 2023 respectively.

4. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the trial of the petitioner is at final stage as the trial of the petitioner is running for recording the statement of the accused persons, so, it will not be proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage.

5. Considering the above submission and mainly the stage of petitioner's trial, this Court is of the view that it will not be proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage as his case is running for recording the statements of the accused persons. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner stands rejected.

6. The trial court shall make all possible endeavours to conclude the trial of the petitioner as per direction dated 23.08.2024 given in Cr. Misc. No. 28249 of 2024. (Shailendra Singh, J) maynaz/- U T