Purushottam Kumar Jha v. State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Review No.265 of 2015 In Letters Patent Appeal No.1778 of 2015 ====================================================== Purushottam Kumar Jha, son of Late Kishori Nath Jha, resident of Dharampur (Ujan) P.O Lohna Road, P.S.- Sakatpur, Distt Darbhanga, Bihar (Correspondence Address:- Purushottam Kumar Jha, C/o Sri Rama Kant Pathak, 4/67. Indrapuri, P.O.- Keshrinagar, Patna-24) is basically field clerk but is conditionally deputed as a law officer-cum-legal Assistant in the Cooperative department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna as well as is posted as a clerk in the office of the District Co-operative Officer, Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna800015.
2. Sri Chaitanya Prasad, Principal Secretary, Department of Co- operation, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna- 800015
3. Sri Ajay Kumar Chaudhary, Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna- 800015
4. Sri Vikas Kumar Briyar, Assistant Registrar, co-operative Societies (Khadi) Bihar, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna- 800001 and Deputed on the post of Assistant Registrar (leave reserve) in the office of the Resp. no.3 null null ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Purushottam Kumar Jha ( In person) For the Respondent/s :
Mr. P.N.Sahi. AAG-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 11-07-2018 The petitioner appears in person. He submits that the points which he had taken in Letters Patent Appeal have not been discussed by the Division Bench of this Court. On the said ground, he is seeking review of the judgment and order dated 09.10.2015, passed in LPA No. 1778 of 2015.
Patna High Court C. REV. No.265 of 2015(3) dt.11-07-2018 2/2 We have perused the application seeking review. The grounds which have been taken by the petitioner seeking review of the judgment and order cannot be treated to be valid grounds for review. There is no apparent error on record which could be pointed out by the petitioner.
This application has no merit and it is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ( Anjana Mishra, J) arun/- U