Ravindra Rai And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 34919 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2018 Thana- Jurawnpur District- Vaishali ======================================================

1. Ravindra Rai, son of Bechan Ray

2. Mithlesh Rai, son of Ravindra Rai

3. Nirmala Devi, wife of Ravindra Rai

4. Mani Devi, wife of Mithlesh Rai

5. Munni Rai @ Gorakh Rai, son of Ravindra Rai above are resident of village-Paharpur Registry tola, P.S.- Jurawanpur, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Smt. Bela Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt. Asha Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2.

02-07-2018 Heard Smt. Bela Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Asha Kumari, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

Five petitioners, who are in-laws of deceased, apprehending their arrest in Jurawanpur P.S. Case No. 22 of 2018 registered for offence under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, have prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

By way of referring to F.I.R., learned counsel for petitioners tried to persuade the Court that despite the fact that none had seen the occurrence, in the F.I.R., a specific accusation has been made as to who has done what during the occurrence.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34919 of 2018(2) dt.02-07-2018 2/2 However, on going through the F.I.R., it is evident that 3-4 days prior to the occurrence, the victim was brutally assaulted by her in-laws and subsequently, she was done to death. On the basis of F.I.R., it is evident that marriage was solemnized in the year 2015 and death has occurred in the house of the petitioners. There is no reason to pass favourable order. The prayer for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. (Rakesh Kumar, J.) anay U T