← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28636/2025bail granted

Rohit Yadav @ Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-06-26Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28636 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-404 Year-2024 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Rohit Yadav @ Pappu Yadav S/o Ajit Yadav @ Ajit Kumar Yadav R/o Village- Gharmohana, P.S.- Lalmaniya, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with G.R. No. 1714/2024 arising out of Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 404/2024 dated 09.12.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 274 and 275 read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 549 litres of illicit Nepali country-made and 108 litres of illicit beer was recovered from the Scorpio.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28636 of 2025(2) dt.26-06-2025 2/2 this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused, Raja Babu. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the said vehicle. The petitioner has two criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 22.02.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Madhubani, in connection with G.R. No. 1714/2024 arising out of Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 404/2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T