← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32651/2026bail rejected

Sudhir Sada @ Bhulla v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-23Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32651 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2025 Thana- MANJHAUL District- Begusarai ====================================================== Sudhir Sada @ Bhulla S/O Bindeshwari sada R/o Vill.- Gadh Khauli, P.s.- Manjhaul, Dist.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 23-07-2026 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Manjhaul P.S. Case No. - 122/2025, lodged on 05/11/2025, under Sections 103(1), 238, 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, the FIR has been lodged against five named accused persons including the present petitioners. It is alleged that the accused persons have murdered the informant's son and in order to destroy the evidence, removed the dead body from the place of occurrence and buried it about 800 metres away from the house.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The name of the petitioner has come in the present case only on the basis of suspicion. There is no eye witness to the occurrence. Learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32651 of 2026(3) dt.23-07-2026 2/2 counsel further submits that no incriminating article connecting the petitioner's involvement with the alleged crime has been found by the police at the crime scene. He further submits that the petitioner is in jail since 27/11/2025. However, the petitioner is willing to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Hon'ble Court in the event of his release on bail.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. He further submits that the petitioner is named in the FIR and there is a direct and specific allegation against him that he along with other accused persons killed the son of informant and buried his dead body.

6. Considering the post-mortem report that external injury has been found on the body of the deceased other than ligature mark, this Court is not inclined to grant bail.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner in connection with Manjhaul P.S. Case No. - 122/2025, pending before the learned ACJM, Manjhaul, Begusarai, is hereby rejected.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Manshi/Ashwini U T