Pintu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52361 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2017 Thana- KARAI PARSARAI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Pintu Yadav son of Baleshwar Yadav, R/o Gwal Bigha, P.S.- Karai Persurai, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Niranjan Parihar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. SRI JAGDHAR PRASAD ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Karai Persurai P. S. Case No. 65 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegedly, the petitioner and other FIR named accused persons opened firing for lifting sand.

Submission is of false implication and that who has stated the name of the petitioner is not disclosed in the FIR, the informant is not the eye witness, he has not identified the petitioner and only on hearsay evidence the petitioner has been implicated, no injury has been caused to anyone, he has been made victim of village politics and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52361 of 2017(2) dt.09-11-2017 2/2 Learned APP opposes the prayer of pre-arrest bail. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named, in case of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Karai Persurai P. S. Case No. 65 of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438

(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T