Ranjan Manjhi @ Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.59098 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -195 Year- 2017 Thana -KAKO District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Ranjan Manjhi @ Ranjan Kumar S/o Anesh Manjhi, R/o VillageHajipur, P.S.- Kako, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uma Shankar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 12-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Kako P.S. Case No. 195 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-379, 307 & other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code.

There is specific allegation against Anesh Manjhi of assaulting the informant on head with Lathi. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner that he having armed with pistol, was giving threat.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Kako P.S. Case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59098 of 2017 (2) dt.12-12-2017 2/2 No. 195 of 2017 to the satisfaction of Sri R. K. Rajak, learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T