← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13850/2012disposed

Rajdeo Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-12-01Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13850 of 2012 =========================================================== Rajdeo Prasad Son Of Late Sarjug Mahto Resident Of Village- Majhaulia, P.O. Majhaulia, Via- Chandanpatti, Sakara, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Panchayati Raj, Bihar, Patna

2. Joint Director Cum-Joint-Secretary Deptt. Of Panchayati Raj Bihar, Patna

3. Director Deptt. Of Panchayati Raj, Bihar, Patna

4. The Collector, Muzaffarpur

5. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Muzaffarpur

6. The Dy. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Null Muzaffarpur

7. The Zila Parishad Muzaffarpur, Through Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Muzaffarpur .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar Manoj, Advocate, Mr. Abhay Kumar Sinha Kundan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Neeraj Raj, A.C. to S.C. XIX For the Zila Parishad : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 01-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

As per stand of the respondents, all admitted dues of the petitioner have been paid.

On 01.10.2015 on the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner the matter was adjourned for four weeks to enable him to file substitution petition as the Court was informed that the sole petitioner had died. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has not received any instruction from the heirs of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.13850 of 2012 dt.01-12-2015 In view of the aforesaid, the Court can only presume that either the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed or the heirs of the petitioner do not want to contest the matter. Either way, there is no justification to keep the matter pending. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off. However, the heirs of the writ petitioner shall be at liberty to file a representation before the authority concerned, if they are convinced that some other dues remain unpaid. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Amin/- U