Patna High CourtCWJC/5545/2013disposed

Sarita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-29Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5545 of 2013 ====================================================== Sarita Kumari, W/O Surya Narayan Mandal, R/O Villge- Phent, P.S.- Basopatti, District- Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Deputy Director, Primary Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Dstrict Magistrate-Cum-President Bihar Education Project, Madhubani.

6. The District Programme Officer, Madhubani.

7. The District Superintendent Of Education-Cum-District Programme Coordinator Bihar Education Project, Madhubani.

8. The Block Development Officer, Kaluahi, District- Madhubani.

9. The Block Education Officer, Kaluahi, District- Madhubani.

10. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Malikapur, District- Madhubani.

11. The Secretary Gram Panchayat Raj, Kalikapur, District- Madhubani.

12. Renu Kumari Mandal W/O Sudhir Kumar R/O Village- Bharatpatti, P.S.- Kaluahi, District- Madhubani.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Satyavrat Verma, Advocate. For the Respondent No. 12. : Mr. Ramu Kanth, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In the present writ application, the petitioner has sought for quashing the order dated 29.01.2013 contained in Memo No. 05, issued by the Secretary, Gram Panchayat Kalikapur, Madhubani, by which his services as Panchayat

Patna High Court CWJC No.5545 of 2013 (3) dt.29-08-2017 2/2 Shishak, Primary School, Nav Toli, Kalikapur, DistrictMadhubani, has been terminated and respondent no. 12 has been directed to be appointed in place of the petitioner. The petitioner is directed to prefer an appeal before the District Appellate Authority, Madhubani, for redressal of his grievance within a period of thirty days from the date of the order, which shall be disposed of in accordance with law within the statutory period.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ application stands disposed of.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U