Haseena Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.6164 of 2012 ===========================================================

1. Haseena Khatoon W/O Late Md. Nizam Uddin Resident Of Village- Neema Tola, Police Station- Barauni, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary Water Resources Minor Irrigation Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. Mr. Deepak Kumar, The Commissioner Water Resources Minor Irrigation Department, Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Begusarai, Mr. Manoj Kumar.

5. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Begusarai, Mr. Dhananjay Thakur.

6. The Block Development Officer Khodabandpur, Begusarai.

7. Mr. Vidrinand Singh, The Block Development Officer, Bakhari, Begusarai, Mr. Nandlal Jayaswal.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. SANJAY PRASAD, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. NIVEDITA NIRVIKAR GP3 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 09-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The present application for initiation of proceeding for contempt against the respondents has been filed alleging non payment of the amount of interest as directed in the order dated 12.09.2012 passed in C.W.J.C No. 16904 of 2012.

Patna High Court MJC No.6164 of 2012 dt.09-12-2015 Earlier on the prayer of the respondents, the matter was adjourned granting liberty to the respondents for compliance of the directions of this court by filing supplementary show cause. It has been stated on behalf of the Opposite Party Nos. 4 to 6 that the order has been complied and the amount of interest as directed has been paid to the petitioner, who has also given a receipt in that regard which has been annexed as Annexure-L. From the perusal of the receipt (Annexure-L) it transpires that the amount of interest as paid by the respondents has been received by the petitioner with further statement that no amount is due as claimed in C.W.J.C No. 16904 of 2012. No rejoinder has been filed on behalf of the petitioner controverting the aforesaid fact.

In view of the aforesaid fact the present application is, accordingly, dismissed.

(V. Nath, J) Ranjan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 26.09.16 Transmission Date N.A.