Saroj Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.59077 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -270 Year- 2017 Thana -RAMNAGAR DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================
1. Saroj Devi W/o Surendra Sah, R/o At Dhokraha, Post Office and Ram Nagar, District- West Champaran (Betiah), Bihar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 12-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Ram Nagar P.S. Case No. 270 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-302, 328, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted that the petitioner is Bhabho of Nandu Sah.
In the written report, it is alleged that while husband of daughter of the informant had gone outside to earn livelihood, Nandu Sah used to come in the house and she was living with Nandu Sah. There is no allegation of any specific overt act against this petitioner in the written report.
In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of her arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59077 of 2017 (2) dt.12-12-2017 2/2 date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Ram Nagar P.S. Case No. 270 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran, Bettiah subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T