← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28897/2022bail granted

Gangai Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-26Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28897 of 2022 Arising Out of Case No.-689 Year-2018 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

GANGAI MUKHIYA Son of Late Paltu Mukhiya Resident of village - Chanaura Ganj Tol, Navtolia, P.S. - Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani. 2.

Mahendra Mukhiya Son of Baudhu Mukhiya Resident of village - Chanaura Ganj Tol, Navtolia, P.S. - Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani. 3.

Rajesh Mukhiya Son of Gangai Mukhiya Resident of village - Chanaura Ganj Tol, Navtolia, P.S. - Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani. 4.

Binod Mukhiya Son of Bulbul Mukhiya Resident of village - Chanaura Ganj Tol, Navtolia, P.S. - Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumari Shubham For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 323, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and u/s 3⁄4 of Prevention of Witchcraft Act. As per the prosecution case, on the allegation of witchcraft these petitioners abused and assaulted the informant and called her Dian.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28897 of 2022(2) dt.26-09-2022 2/2 the case. It is submitted that as per allegation these petitioners only tried to put dirt in the mouth of complainant and no overt act has been alleged against them. The complaint petition was lodged after four months of the occurrence. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts of the case and clean antecedent of the petitioners, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with C.R. case No.689/ 2018, subject to conditions laid down u/s 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T