Bibi Sabnam @ Sabnam Khatoon v. The Stat Election Commission And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1657 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21579 of 2012 ====================================================== Bibi Sabnam @ Sabnam Khatoon .... .... Appellant

Versus

The State Election Commission & Ors .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant :

Mr. S.B.K. Mangalam, Advocate Mr. Chandan, Advocate For the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: Mr. Amit Shrivastava, Advocate Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent Nos.4 to 8: Mr. Partha Sarthy, G.A.-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI) 22-01-2015 Learned counsel for the parties submit that their appearance has inadvertently been let out in the cause title caption of order, dated 19.01.2015.

It is, therefore, directed that in the cause title caption of the order, dated 19.01.2015, the appearance of the learned counsel for the parties, shall stand corrected, and be henceforth read, as follows :

"For the Appellant:

Mr. S.B.K. Mangalam, Advocate Mr. Chandan, Advocate For the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: Mr. Amit Shrivastava, Advocate Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent Nos.4 to 8: Mr. Partha Sarthy, G.A.- 11"

(I. A. Ansari, J) (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) Pawan/- U