Mithlesh Yadav @ Mithilesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29216 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2025 Thana- NAVINAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Mithlesh Yadav @ Mithilesh Yadav Son of Ram Chandra Yadav R/o VillageBirbal Bigha, P.O.- Samari Dhamani, P.S.- Mali, Dist- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ahmad Ali, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 308(3), 308(4), 308(5) and 351(3) of the BNS, under Section 13 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and under Sections 18 & 20 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Ordinance Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that 10-12 persons handed over t letter to the security staff which was purported to be of Communist party Maowadi. A mobile number was also given in that latter on which the party was to be conducted before starting the work.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that his name has surfaced in this case as a mobile was recovered from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29216 of 2025(2) dt.19-05-2025 2/2 his possession and it is alleged that from his mobile, there was evidence of communication with the alleged mobile in the FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in this case no TIP has been conducted. The mobile which has been recovered from his possession is not that mobile number which is given in the FIR. Only allegation is that the petitioner had talk with the alleged mobile. The petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 08.03.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 73 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Durgesh/- U T