Patna High CourtCWJC/1516/2015dismissed

Sanjay Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-02-07Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1516 of 2015 ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar Jha son of Hira Nand Jha, resident of village Balua Tola, Post Office Dandkhora, Police Station Dandkhora, District- Katihar. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development, (Primary Education), Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Katihar.

4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Katihar.

5. The District Programme Officer ( Establishment) Education Department, Katihar.

6. The Appellate Authority District Teacher Appointment Appellate Tribunal, Katihar.

7. The Block Development Officer, Dandkhora, Katihar.

8. The Block Education Officer, Dandkhora Block, Katihar.

9. Mukhiya-cum-Chairman Panchayat level Teachers Appointment Committee Gram Panchayat Raj, Raipur, P.O. Dandkhora, District Katihar.

10. The Secretary Gram Panchayat Raj, Raipur cum Panchayat level Teachers Appointment Committee Gram Panchayat Raj, Raipur, Block P.O and P.S- Dandkhora, District- Katihar.

11. Sumit Kumar S/O Deep Narayan Singh, presently posted as Panchayat Teacher New Primary School Pararia Kala, Gram Panchayt Raj, Raipur, Block Dandkhora, District Katihar.

12. Pawan Kumar S/O Sri Hari Narayan Mahto presently posted as Panchayat Teacher New Primary School Pararia Kala, Gram Panchayat Raj, Raipur, Block Dandkhora, District Katihar.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jibendra Mishra For the Respondent/s : AC to GP - 6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3.

07-02-2017 Sri Jibendra Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of learned A.C. to Govt. Pleader - 16, submits that now the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, it is dismissed as same has become infructuous.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U