Jai Prakash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29090 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2020 Thana- KUMAR KHAND District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.

JAI PRAKASH YADAV, Son of Late Bindeshwari Yadav, Resident of Village- Kewatgama, Ward No.15, P.S.- Kumarkhand, District- Madhepura. 2.

Sintu Kumar @ Sintu Kumar Yadav, Son of Jai Prakash Yadav, Resident of Village- Kewatgama, Ward No.15, P.S.- Kumarkhand, District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-12-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State through Video Conferencing.

Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 354(B), 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, on 30.03.2020 at about 10:00 AM, all the accused persons including these petitioners entered into the courtyard of the informant and assaulted them with Lathi, Danda and Farsa. It is further alleged that coaccused, Pintu Kumar Yadav, inflicted Farsa blow on the head of the Kishor Yadav and Petitioner No.2, Sintu Kumar, is said to have made the informant half naked.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29090 of 2020(2) dt.03-12-2020 2/2 case and counter-case. There is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. Specific allegation of causing injury is against co-accused, Pintu Kumar Yadav. It is stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that petitioners have got clean antecedent.

Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender, let the petitioners mentioned above be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in Kumarkhand Police Station Case No. 74 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Ankit/- U T