Parveen Kumar @ Praveen Kumar Bhagat v. The Government Of India Through Office Of Senior Intelligance Officer, Delhi And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2413 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- PURNIA =========================================================== PARVEEN KUMAR @ PRAVEEN KUMAR BHAGAT, Son of Prithvi Chand Bhagat, Resident of Poonam Place Flat No. 02/I ND Ghy, Kamrup, P.O.- Panbazar, P.S. - Fancybazar, Dist- Assam- 781001.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Government of India through office of Senior Intelligence Officer, Delhi.

2. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Sub Regional Unit, Purnea, Maa B Plaza Complex, Kaptan Para, Khuskibagh, Purnea - 854305.

3. Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Maa B Plaza Complex, Kaptan Para, Khuskibagh, Purnea - 854305. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Samir Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr.

For the UOI (DRI) : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, CGC =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 13-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This writ application has been filed for quashing the order dated 12.07.2017 passed in Special Case No. 04 of 2017/CIS No. 02 of 2017 by the learned Special Judge, NDPS, Purnea whereby the learned court below has refused to release 200 and 22 bags carrying scrap plastic and miscellaneous steel utensils materials on a truck.

3. The prayer was refused for the reason that from the same truck narcotics was recovered and the bags were used for hiding the narcotics, as such, were fit to be confiscated and auctioned.

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.2413 of 2017 dt.13-12-2017 2/2

4. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that it was mischief of the driver of the truck that on the way, he loaded some Ganja on the said truck which was, in fact, carrying huge quantity of scrap material. The petitioner is concerned with the scrape material only.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances, let the scrap material be released in favour of petitioner on execution of surety bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (rupees one lakh) (not in the form of bank guarantee or cash) along with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned court below/authority concerned where the case is pending.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ application, accordingly, disposed of.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- AFR/NAFR N.A.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 16.12.2017 Transmission Date 16.12.2017