Sunita Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29784 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2022 Thana- JALALPUR District- Saran ====================================================== SUNITA DEVI WIFE OF ANARAS MANJHI R/O-PIRARI, P.S.- JALALPUR, DISTT.-SARAN ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a woman and is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 20 liters of liquor kept in a sack near a canal, near the house of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from her conscious possession, it is next submitted that even the alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and she came to be implicated falsely by
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29784 of 2023(2) dt.18-05-2023 2/2 villager, but then the name of the villager is not disclosed in the F.I.R. which casts aspersion on the veracity of the allegation as alleged.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jalalpur P.S. Case No. 217 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T