Mithun Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28689 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2025 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Mithun Manjhi S/O Late Gariban Manjhi Resident of Village- Unta Madarpur, P.S.- Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad, ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pronoti Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-05-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of six cases and allegation is of recovery of 20 liters of liquor from a hut near the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a hut which does not belong to the petitioner and he came to be implicated based on secret information which

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28689 of 2025(2) dt.07-05-2025 2/3 is the easiest way to implicate someone. It is further submitted that once an accused is implicated in a case relating to excise, the police starts implicating mechanically either at the instance of Chowkidar, local person, confessional statement or secret information.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 78 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. It is made clear that the learned Trial Court after accepting the provisional anticipatory bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than six cases then it would be presumed that petitioner,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28689 of 2025(2) dt.07-05-2025 3/3 for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail shall not be confirmed, but in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of six cases only in that event the provisional anticipatory bail bonds shall be confirmed forthwith.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T