Rakesh Kumar v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.1045 of 2016 =========================================================== Rakesh Kumar son of Sri Prabhu singh, resident of village- Bishunpura Tara Madhuban, p.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran .... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum, New Delhi
2. Indian Oil Corporation through its Deputy General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Loknayak Jay Parkash Bhawan, 5th floor, Patna.
3. General Manger, Indian Oil Corporation ltd. Bihar State Office, Loknayak Jay Parakash Bhawan, 5th floor, Patna.
4. The Senior Divisional Retails Sales Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Krishna Complex, Akharaghat Road, Muzaffarpur..
5. Geeta Devi, wife of Sri Tunna Prasad, resident of Pakridayal P.S.- Pakridayal, District - East Champaran.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant : Mr. Chitranjan Sinha, Sr. Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mrs. Kanak Verma, C.G.C. For I.O.C. : Mr. Anil Kr. Sinha, Advocate Mr. Amlesh Kr. Verma, Advocate For private Respondent : Mr. Nikhil Agrawal, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 02-05-2017 While disposing of C.W.J.C. No.7896 of 2014 on 08.04.2016, the following directions were issued : "11. The IOCL shall consider the petitioner's complaint and pass orders afresh after observing the procedure by granting opportunity as well as supplying materials relied upon, to the petitioner in terms of Clause 18 of the brochure. The IOCL shall decide the matter on its own merits without being influenced by any observation as may have been made herein, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production
Patna High Court LPA No.1045 of 2016 dt.02-05-2017 2/2 of a copy of this judgment."
It is stated by learned counsel appearing for the appellant that the Indian Oil Corporation has not taken a decision as directed in para 11 as indicated hereinabove.
If that be so, a decision be now taken and communicated to the petitioner within 30 days. In case a decision has already been taken, the same be communicated to the petitioner forthwith. With the aforesaid, the appeal is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.
CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 13.05.2017 Transmission Date