Mithun Bind And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 52763 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -88 Year- 2017 Thana -TARAPUR District- MUNGER ======================================================
1. Mithun Bind, Son of Ghanshyam Bind
2. Kailash Bind, Son of Punit Bind, Both Resident of Village - Barai, P.S. Haweli Kharagpur, District - Munger.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
The FIR of robbery is against unknown. Name of the petitioners had transpired in the confessional statement of coaccused, namely, Amar Kumar and Pinkesh Kumar. Petitioners have stated on oath that they have got no criminal antecedent and there is no other material against the petitioners, save and except, confessional statement of the coaccused before the police. Considering the aforesaid fact, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52763 of 2017 (2) dt.09-11-2017 2/2 Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Tarapur Police Station Case No. 88 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the petitioners shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners. (Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T