Raju Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29261 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2022 Thana- JANDAHA District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

RAJU KUMAR SINGH Son of Baiyda Nath Singh Resident of Village - Madhepur, P.S.- Dalsingh Sarai, District - Samastipur. 2.

RITESH KUMAR Son of Pramod Singh Resident of Village - Gauspur, P.S.- Dalsingh Sarai, District - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-08-2022 Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Jandaha P.S. Case No. 67/2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 38, 41 (i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

As per prosecution case, there is alleged recovery of total 86.895 liters foreign liquor from the car. The petitioners were apprehended on the spot.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29261 of 2022(2) dt.05-08-2022 2/3 petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The said car belongs to petitioner no.2 and the seizure list has not been prepared as per law. He further submits that the police have implanted the said liquor on non-fulfillment of illegal gratification. The petitioners are languishing in custody since 07.03.2022 and bear no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence. The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, charge sheet has already been submitted and keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioners and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.1 cum Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Jandaha P.S. Case No. 67/2022, subject to following conditions:-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29261 of 2022(2) dt.05-08-2022 3/3 (i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

(ii) Petitioners will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself. (iii) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) amitkumar/- U T