Akhil Bhartiya Balmiki Mahasabha v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9291 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Akhil Bhartiya Balmiki Mahasabha through its National General Secretary Motilal Anand Son of late Bino Ram Resident of Village+PostManjhaul, PS Cheriya Bariarpur District Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India , Through the Cabinet Secretary, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

2. The Secretary, Prime Minister's Office, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

3. The Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowernment, Government of India, New Delhi.

4. The Secretary, National Commission for Safai Karamchari, Lok Nayak Bhawan , Khan Market , New Delhi.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prashant Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Tiwary, C.G.C. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 19-09-2016 Heard Mr. Prashant Sinha, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. A.K.Tiwary, C.G.C., appearing for the respondents.

During course of argument, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised.

To the submissions so made, no objection has been raised on behalf of the respondents.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9291 of 2016 (2) dt.19-09-2016 In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised.

(I.A. Ansari,CJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) A.I./- U