Nitish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.37054 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-325 Year-2017 Thana- SIRDALLA District- Nawada ====================================================== Nitish Kumar, son of Amirak Prasad @ Amirak Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village : Singhauli, Police Station Sirdalla, District - Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arjun Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Kanhaiya Kishore, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case No.325 of 2017, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 447, 385, 341, 323, 307, 325, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation has been made that group of persons made an unlawful assembly and came to the house of the informant and assaulted the informant and his family members. There is no specific allegation has been made against the petitioner save and except that he was a member of the mob.
Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, Nitish Kumar, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37054 of 2018(2) dt.03-07-2018 2/2 learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, V, Nawada, in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case no.325 of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Further condition is that whenever the police will call the petitioner for the purposes of investigation and interrogation, he will remain present for the investigation. In the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the present order will be treated to have been cancelled.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T