Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29896 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2022 Thana- NIMACHANDPURA District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

DEEPAK KUMAR @ DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH SON OF RAMJEE SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHANDPURA, PS- NIMA CHANDPURA, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI 2.

RAMJEE SINGH SON OF LATE KHUSHO SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHANDPURA, PS- NIMA CHANDPURA, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sudish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Amitesh Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-07-2023

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the prayer for anticipatory bail with respect to petitioner no. 2, namely, Ramjee Singh.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail with respect to petitioner no. 2 is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner no. 1 and learned A.P.P. for the State.

5. The petitioner no. 1 apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354(B), 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner no. 1 submits that petitioner no. 1 is a person with clean antecedent.

7. The informant alleges that petitioner no. 1 abused her in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29896 of 2023(2) dt.18-07-2023 2/2 the field and pulled her saree and threatened not to institute any case.

8. Learned counsel for the petitioner no. 1 submits that petitioner no. 1 has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that from bare perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the same does not inspire confidence and there is land dispute between them. It is next submitted that the allegation of snatching ornament is ornamental in nature.

9. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner no. 1.

10. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner no. 1, the petitioner no. 1 above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Nimachandpura P.S. Case No. 121 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T