Ram Prasad Sah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12079 of 2015 ====================================================== 1.

Ram Prasad Sah, Son of Late Baldeo Sah, Resident of VillageNakuch, Post Office- Mainagram, Police Station- Mahishi, District- Saharsa.

2.

Shyam Sundar Prasad Gupta, Son of Shiv Kumar Prasad Gupta, Resident of Village- Indarba, Post Office- Rauta, Police StationSour Bazar, District- Saharsa. 3.

Bhagwat Sah, Son of Madhu Sah, Resident of Village- Sihaul, Post Office- Sihaul, Police Station- Bihra, District- Saharsa. 4.

Madan Prasad Yadav, Son of Jhulan Prasad YAdav, Resident of Village- Chakla, Post Office- Gauth Bardaha, Police StationGhaidadh, District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saharsa. 4.

The District Education Officer, Saharsa.

5.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Saharsa. 6.

The Accountant General, Bihar, Beer Chand Patel Path, Patna. 7.

The Head Master, Primary School, Rampur, Anchal- Sour Bazar, DistrictSaharsa. 8.

The Head Master, Primary School, Rasalpur, Anchal- Nauhatta, DistrictSaharsa. 9.

The Head Master, Upgraded Middle School, Banchalha, Anchal- Sour Bazar, District- Saharsa.

10. The Head Master, Primary School, Ram Nagar, Anchal- Nauhatta, DistrictSaharsa. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shashi Dhar Jha For the State :

Ms Nutan Sahay, AC to AAG 12 For the AG :

Mr Mani Kant Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 22-09-2017 Heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the State. Not any kind of certification obtained by a teacher showing himself to acquire training will make him entitled for matric trained scale. Rule is unambiguous, which has been brought on

Patna High Court CWJC No.12079 of 2015 dt.22-09-2017 2/2 record as Annexure- A to the counter affidavit of respondent no.5. Only two years training degree from a recognized institution can confer the status of training, which, in turn, can lead to grant of benefit of matric trained scale. Obviously, since these petitioners do not seem to have obtained training of recognized kind, the certification, which they have obtained, does not in any manner indicate that it is a two year training. It is only a one year training, which they have obtained, which cannot beget them matric trained scale.

Writ application has no merit. It is dismissed. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 22.09.2017 Transmission Date NA