Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31792/2024bail granted

Urmila Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-06Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31792 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2024 Thana- KHAIRA District- Saran ====================================================== Urmila Devi Wife Of Subash Rai Resident Of Village- Dhup Nagar Mathiya, P.S.- Khaira, Dist- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birmani Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP For the Informant/s :

Mr. Brij Kishore Mishra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Khaira P.S Case No. 43/2024 dated 11.02.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 304B read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have killed the informant's daughter due to non-fulfillment of demand of a motorcycle as dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31792 of 2024(2) dt.06-05-2024 2/2 petitioner who is mother-in-law of the informant's daughter. The petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the deceased. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 11.02.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Saran, Chapra in connection with Khaira P.S Case No. 43/2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T