← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16383/2014disposed

Girish Prasad v. Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. And ORS

2023-07-20Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16383 of 2014 ====================================================== Girish Prasad son of late Dwarika Prasad resident of Club Road near Old DEO Office Sonbarsa Bami Press P.O. Aurangabad P.S. Aurangabad, District Aurangabad Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. through its Chairman-cumManaging Director, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2.

Managing Director South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3.

Deputy General Manager-Cum-E.S.E. Magadh Electric Supply Area, Gaya. 4.

Electrical Superintending Engineer Electric Supply Circle, Gaya. 5.

Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Aurangabad. 6.

Assistant Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Sub-Division, Aurangabad. 7.

Assistant Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Sub-Division, Nabinagar District Aurangabad.

8.

Assistant Electric Engineer, Electric Supply Sub-Division Rafiganj, District Aurangabad.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Hriday Prasad, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mrs. Namrata Mishra, Adv.

Mr.Diwesh Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 20-07-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this is an application for issuance of appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents for payment of pending overtime bills and for grant of all consequential benefits." At the outset, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Company submits that the outstanding amount of

Patna High Court CWJC No.16383 of 2014(2) dt.20-07-2023 2/2 overtime salary to the tune of Rs.58,042/- has already stood paid to the petitioner during the interregnum period. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in case the payment of the aforesaid amount has already been made to the petitioner, then the petitioner is not having any subsisting grievances.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U